A PUBLICATION OF THE REPUBLIC

horizontal full colour

THE DAILY CONFUSION

An Independent Newspaper of Unconfirmed Origin

ISSUE 001   |   THE HUMAN CONDITIONPrice: Determined by the reader. Subject to review.

NATION FALLING BEHIND, GOVERNMENT CONFIRMS

Nobody has been identified as being ahead. Authorities say this does not affect the seriousness of the situation.

A solemn official measures a houseplant which is growing towards the window.
The plant has not submitted its five-year plan.

The Ministry of Comparative Affairs has declared a national state of urgency following widespread reports that citizens are falling behind in life.

The announcement came after a woman aged 34 contacted the Ministry to report that she was running out of time.

"How much time do you have left?" an official asked.

"I don't know."

"What are you trying to finish?"

"Everything."

The official opened a file.

By lunchtime, the Ministry had received similar reports from 11,000 citizens, including a student who believed he should already own property, a newly married woman concerned that her friends had more successful marriages and a retired businessman who felt he had retired too early.

The Ministry convened an emergency meeting.

The Minister opened proceedings by asking whether anyone knew where the country was supposed to be going.

Nobody answered.

The Deputy Minister suggested that the destination might be success.

"What does success look like?" asked the Minister.

The Deputy Minister referred the question to a subcommittee.

The comparison problem

Investigators visited the home of a 42-year-old engineer who had recently become dissatisfied with his life.

Until Tuesday, the engineer had considered himself reasonably fortunate. He had a home, a family and work he enjoyed.

On Tuesday morning, he learnt that a former classmate had purchased a second house in London.

"I suddenly realised I was behind," he told investigators.

"Behind whom?"

"My classmate."

"Was he racing you?"

"No."

"Did he know you were competing?"

"I doubt it."

"Then how did you lose?"

The engineer requested a lawyer.

In another case, a 29-year-old woman told investigators she was worried about being unmarried.

Her mother confirmed that the situation was serious.

Asked whether her daughter was unhappy, the mother replied that this was beside the point.

"People are asking questions."

The Ministry has opened a separate inquiry into the identity of these people.

So far, nobody has supplied a name.

Conflicting evidence

The investigation became more complicated when officials discovered that citizens considered successful by others were also reporting that they were behind.

A wealthy businessman said he felt unsuccessful because a younger businessman was wealthier.

The younger businessman was unavailable for comment. His assistant confirmed that he had recently begun comparing himself with a third businessman.

The third businessman could not be located.

An international search is under consideration.

An unexpected witness

Late yesterday, investigators interviewed a 76-year-old woman sitting outside her house.

She was watching two birds argue over a piece of bread.

"Madam, do you ever feel you are falling behind?" an investigator asked.

"Behind what?"

"Life."

She looked at him for a while.

"Where has it gone?"

The investigator checked his questionnaire.

There was no box for her answer.

He marked her response as incomplete.

Official statement

The Minister has reassured citizens that the government is committed to ensuring nobody falls behind.

A national timetable for living is being prepared.

The timetable will specify appropriate ages for marriage, financial independence, career advancement and general satisfaction.

Asked whether citizens would be permitted to follow different paths, the Minister said exceptions could be considered upon written application.

Applications must be submitted before the relevant deadline.

The Ministry has yet to determine the deadline.

Meanwhile, citizens have been advised to continue as normal.

Several have requested clarification.

APPLICANTThe citizen
RESPONDENTThe same citizen
ORIGINAL JUDGEAlso the citizen
DEFENCE COUNSELNot appointed

Woman Seeks to Overturn Judgment Delivered Against Herself Seventeen Years Ago

Case No. 001/19: A Citizen v. Herself

A 36-year-old woman has petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn a judgment declaring her a failure.

The judgment was delivered when she was 19, shortly after she failed an important examination.

Court records indicate that the applicant conducted the original proceedings alone.

She presented the evidence, examined herself and delivered the verdict.

No defence counsel was appointed.

The judgment read:

"You will never amount to anything."

The applicant told the Court that she had carried the ruling for seventeen years.

During that period, she completed further education, found employment, changed careers, supported members of her family and recovered from several difficult experiences.

Counsel asked why the original verdict had remained in force despite this evidence.

"Because I believed it," she said.

The prosecution argued that the judgment had acquired historical significance.

"Her entire adult life has been organised around proving it wrong. To overturn it now would raise difficult questions about what all that effort was for."

The presiding judge considered this argument.

"Are you suggesting that an incorrect judgment should stand because the defendant has spent seventeen years obeying it?"

"Precisely, My Lord."

The judge removed his glasses.

"That is a very serious submission."

"Thank you, My Lord."

"It was not a compliment."

Proceedings were briefly suspended.

When the Court resumed, the judge asked the applicant whether she wished to replace the old verdict with a declaration that she was successful.

She considered the question.

"No," she said.

"Why not?"

"I think I'd rather stop being on trial."

The Court fell silent.

The clerk checked whether silence was permitted during proceedings.

The matter has been reserved for judgment.

Self-Worth Index Suffers Sharp Decline Following Former Classmate's Promotion

Two grave financial analysts inspect a plate of plantain through a magnifying glass.
Analysts await a statement from the plantain.
CIRCUMSTANCES UNCHANGEDSELF-ASSESSMENT ↓

The National Self-Worth Index fell yesterday despite no measurable deterioration in the affected citizen's circumstances.

The decline followed an announcement that his former university classmate had been appointed managing director of an international company.

The citizen was at home eating plantain when the news arrived.

He immediately lost his appetite.

Market analysts initially suspected a change in his income or employment prospects.

Further examination found neither.

The Ministry of Validation has described the incident as a classic case of comparative depreciation.

Its proposed recovery measures include an impressive social media announcement and a carefully timed photograph suggesting professional success.

A junior analyst asked whether the citizen could simply finish his plantain.

The question was omitted from the final report.

Market close: The citizen's circumstances remain stable. His opinion of them has deteriorated.

Woman Completes Argument With Husband Six Hours Before He Returns Home

ADVANCE TRANSCRIPT / EXTRACT

11.00
Argument begins. Husband absent.
15.40
Weekend arrangements reconsidered.
18.12
Husband arrives. Bread present.

Attendance recorded after proceedings.

A resident has successfully concluded a major marital dispute that has not yet taken place.

The argument began at approximately 11 a.m. when the woman imagined her husband's likely response to a question she intended to ask that evening.

By noon, he had denied responsibility.

At 1.15 p.m., he had raised his voice.

By 2 p.m., she had reminded him of an incident from 2021.

The dispute reached its most serious stage at 3.40 p.m., when she considered spending the weekend with her sister.

Her husband returned home at 6.12 p.m. carrying bread.

He asked whether she had eaten.

She informed him that she was still very upset.

He requested further information.

The Ministry of Future Problems has commended the woman's ability to prepare for difficult conversations.

Her husband has requested access to the minutes.

Couple Disagree Over What Was Meant by "Fine"

EXHIBIT A

fine.

Meaning disputed. Punctuation inconclusive.

Negotiations have stalled between two residents following a disagreement over the word fine.

The dispute began when one party asked whether the other was upset.

"Fine," came the reply.

The first party understood this to mean that matters were satisfactory.

The second party has disputed that interpretation.

Both parties have submitted evidence concerning tone, timing and facial expression.

An independent linguist was invited to assist but withdrew after receiving a message from his own wife reading, "Do whatever you want."

He is currently unavailable.

MINISTRY OF NOISE / RECORDS UNITNOT FOR CIRCULATION
FILE: 001/NCOPY 01 OF 00RELEASE STATUS: WITHHELD

Leaked From The Ministry Of Noise

INTERNAL MEMORANDUM 001/N

Subject: Unauthorised Period of Mental Quiet

An unusual incident was recorded yesterday afternoon when a citizen sat beside a window for approximately six seconds without reviewing a past mistake or anticipating a future difficulty.

The Ministry's monitoring unit initially suspected a technical failure.

A response officer introduced a memory of an embarrassing comment made at a wedding in 2014.

Normal activity resumed.

The citizen subsequently spent eleven minutes considering whether the bride's aunt had misunderstood him.

The Ministry considers the intervention successful.

However, a junior officer has raised a concern.

According to his report, the citizen appeared content during the original six seconds.

The officer has been asked to explain why he considers this relevant.

An official uses an enormous ear trumpet to investigate a woman quietly watching birds at a window.
No disturbance detected. A disturbing finding.
Routing slip / distribution record

Distribution: Everyone.

Authority for release: name withheld

File retained as proof that no copy was released.

Please account for this copy.

RECEIVEDCONFIDENTIALITY REQUEST / PENDING

Letters To The Editor

This Newspaper Is Becoming Personal

Dear Editor,

I object to the growing tendency of your newspaper to publish articles that appear to concern me.

Last week's report on people who rehearse conversations in the shower was particularly unnecessary.

I do not know how you obtained this information.

I also object to your repeated suggestion that ordinary people spend excessive time worrying about what others think.

Some of us have reputations to maintain.

I would appreciate confirmation that this letter will not be published.

Yours faithfully,
A Concerned Citizen

The Corrections Desk

Correction 001

An earlier report stated that a citizen had wasted her entire twenties.

Records confirm that she was present for all ten years.

The description has been withdrawn.

Correction 002

The Ministry of Comparative Affairs has requested that we correct our statement that nobody knows what they are doing.

The Ministry insists that several people know what they are doing.

It has promised to introduce us to one.

Correction 003

Our report that a citizen had made a fool of himself at dinner was based entirely on his own testimony.

The other guests have no recollection of the incident.

The citizen disputes their recollection.

Classified Advertisements

FOR SALE

One carefully maintained public image.

Slightly damaged by an honest conversation.

Offers invited.

WANTED

Someone who can explain what everybody else is doing with their lives.

Previous applicants have been unable to establish what they themselves are doing.

LOST PROPERTY

One perfectly good afternoon.

Last seen being used to reconsider a remark made three years ago.

Owner desperate for its return.

Public Notice

SUPREME COURT OF HUMAN AFFAIRS

Citizens are advised that the Court is experiencing an unprecedented backlog of cases concerning matters already concluded.

These include conversations that ended years ago, examinations whose results cannot be changed and opinions held by people who may no longer remember expressing them.

Citizens are requested to consider whether further proceedings are necessary.

A number of citizens have interpreted this notice as criticism.

New cases have been opened.

NISSUED FOR PUBLIC CONSIDERATION
COMPLIANCE NOT YET DEFINED